Review of Current and Expected Underground Coal Mining Methods and an Evaluation of the Best Practices Associated with These
Review of underground coal production systems in South Africa set against practice in Australia, China and the United States, with guidance on equipment choice and section planning.
by André William Dougall | 2010
South African underground sections average about 60 000 t a month, against 130 000 to 160 000 t for single pass bolter miner units on continuous haulage, while the better sections target 1.4 to 1.6 Mt a year. Australian longwalls deliver 5 to 7 Mt a year from one face, compared with 3 to 5 Mt at the two local wall operations.
R1500,00
Description
Related Products
Hydrothermal Treatment of Coal Discards and Sewage Sludge for the Production of Advanced Materials
2023
Laboratory carbonisation tests on discard and slurry samples blended with sewage sludge, with the resulting chars tested as adsorbents for dissolved pharmaceuticals. For waste and water treatment planners.
What this report foundCo-treating coal discards with sewage sludge by hydrothermal carbonisation gave hydrochars with better physicochemical properties than treating either waste...
R1500,00
Co-treating coal discards with sewage sludge by hydrothermal carbonisation gave hydrochars with better physicochemical properties than treating either waste alone. The blended hydrochar reached a surface area of 20.35 m2/g and a pore volume of 0.38 cm3/g, and removed 97.19% of nevirapine and 93.32% of lamivudine from recycled water. Routes to activated carbon and hydrogen storage were also assessed.
TRI-FLO™ Tests Conducted at South Witbank Coal Mine
2003
Trial of an imported dense medium separator installed in a fine coal pilot plant at a Witbank mine, for plant designers weighing alternatives to cyclones.
What this report foundThe separator handled fine coal and produced a 28 MJ/kg product, but its measured separation efficiency was lower than that of conventional dense medium...
R1500,00
200317 pages
The separator handled fine coal and produced a 28 MJ/kg product, but its measured separation efficiency was lower than that of conventional dense medium cyclones and it was harder to operate. Two efficiency tests produced no evidence that the unit outperforms cyclones on fine coal, so cyclones were recommended when the plant was rebuilt at its next site.