Coaltech Research Association

Rehabilitation risk assessment model

VD Weyer / February 2020

R1500,00

Description

Related Products

Treatment of Sulphate Rich Effluents with the Combined Electrolytic/Biological Process

2003

Laboratory work on producing hydrogen by electrolysis as the energy source for sulphate reducing bacteria, aimed at cutting the running cost of treating sulphate rich mine water.

What this report foundHydrogen for biological sulphate removal can be generated on site by electrolysis more cheaply than it can be bought.

R1500,00

R1500,00

What this report found

Hydrogen for biological sulphate removal can be generated on site by electrolysis more cheaply than it can be bought. Stainless steel electrodes in acid mine drainage gave hydrogen at about a third of the bought in price while oxidising ferrous iron to ferric, which helps downstream treatment. Iron and zinc electrodes dissolved too quickly to be viable.

Lesley S Jeffrey

National and Sector-Specific Social and Economic Implications of Selecting Capital or Labour Intensive Methods of Coal Production

2002

Scenario modelling of the sector wide and national employment and economic effects of production method choice in underground coal mining, for planners and policy makers.

What this report foundCompares labour intensive mechanised drill and blast underground mining with capital intensive bord and pillar using continuous miners, and adds the option of...

R1500,00

R1500,00

What this report found

Compares labour intensive mechanised drill and blast underground mining with capital intensive bord and pillar using continuous miners, and adds the option of substituting locally made goods for imported supplies. Input data came from two mines running both types of section under comparable geological conditions, covering worker numbers, skill profiles, cost structures and import dependence, then calibrated to industry totals to drive a socio-economic model.

Shopping Basket